Can-You-Be-Legally-Fired-for-Dating-a-Coworker.jpg (2149×1159)Relationships in the workplace are on the rise. Recent research from the Discovery Health Channel suggests that nearly half of modern professionals now meet their future spouses at work and over 80% of professionals below the age of 30 were found to have no problem with the idea of dating their coworkers. This makes perfect sense. We spend a lot of time at work and the people we’re closest to are often those we work with. Long hours, group projects, and the fact that you chose the same or similar careers are all recipes for accidental romance. But businesses usually don’t see it this way.

Office Romance From the Employer Perspective

While finding romance in the workplace is an unavoidable part of modern life, the relationships and aftermaths of said relationships can wreak havoc for your employers. Supervisors dating subordinates can lead to favoritism or coercion. Any breakup can result in nasty accusations of sexual harassment, and even couples who are happy together can cause distractions and lowered productivity. While most employees can be sympathetic to an employer’s desire to avoid these risks, the way an employer responds to the inevitable romance situations is really what matters.

Office Dating as a Firing Offense

One of the most controversial HR policies that is still in practice all over the world is a firing policy for dating coworkers. Many employers make it a blanket-policy that zero workplace relationships are allowed no matter how separated when actually in the workplace. Some force employees to sign no-love contract, others simply mention it in the employee handbook, but the policy stands. In a surprising number of workplaces, any ‘fraternization’ proven or suspected is met with firing one or both parties.

Sometimes there is a probationary period, sometimes there’s not. There might be warnings or reprimands, but some employers will simply tell you to get your things and leave.

Is Firing for Office Dating Legal?

Employers are allowed to employ or not employ whoever they choose. While the patterns of their decision-making mater in relation to discrimination and equal opportunity, they can hire or fire any employee at-will with little or no provocation. They can fire you for breaking a rule in the employee handbook, for disobeying a reasonable order from a superior, or just ’cause. This applies as long as the firing doesn’t follow a discriminatory pattern or seem to be based on legal discrimination. Because employers have the right to fire people for, say, wearing the wrong color hat to work, they can also fire you for dating.

With one exception in the state of California. The California state laws have established that an employee’s personal life outside of work is protected and employers are not allowed to make disciplinary decisions based on off-hours activities including who you date.

When is Office Dating Protected?

Here in California, there have been a lot of employment disputes over the last several decades and one of the important victories to be noted is in the realm of office dating. Employers are allowed to fire you for interfering with work, for supervisors dating subordinates, and for making your romance a distraction in the workplace. However, due to a protection of employee privacy and your right to a private life (in California only) they cannot fire you for having an off-hours relationship with someone who happens to be employed by the same company.

What Can I Do If I’ve Been Fired for Office Dating?

If you have been fired for office dating in California but kept your relationship off-hours and away from your work, your employer has acted illegally. They may think they were within the law and will surely argue this fact but the more private your relationship has been, the more protection you have. Here at Aiman-Smith & Marcy, we specialize in helping wronged employees get the respect, compensation, and opportunities they deserve. If you have been unlawfully fired for an office relationship, please contact us today!

Leave a Reply

Lisseth Bayona

Attorney

Education and Background

I am a Los Angeles native and daughter of Salvadorian immigrants. From an early age, my parents instilled the value of hard work and education in me and my two siblings. Their perseverance enabled each of us to graduate from college and earn professional degrees.

My interest and commitment to workers’ rights have roots in my parents’ experiences as undocumented workers in Los Angeles. Witnessing the challenges they faced inspired me to pursue a career where I can help individuals confronted with similar struggles. To help someone in those moments is very satisfying. I love connecting with people and learning about their stories. I believe that dignity in the workplace is a right of all workers, not a convenience or privilege reserved for employees of a certain race, gender, age, sexual orientation, or gender identity.

Legal Experience

I received my J.D. from the University of Southern California (USC) Gould School of Law. While there, I served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Patrick J. Walsh of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, where I drafted a criminal judicial opinion. Also, while at Gould, I served as an extern for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. As a Criminal Division Extern, I had the opportunity to work closely with a trial team of Assistant U.S. Attorneys on a money laundering case which further sparked my interest in litigation.

Personal Interests

In my free time, I enjoy urban vegetable gardening, traveling, and spending time with my nephew and niece. I also love to spend time at San Onofre Beach learning to surf, although admittedly, I am not very good.

Education

 

Hallie L. Von Rock

Attorney (SBN 233152)

Education and Background

I moved to the Bay Area from Washington after graduating high school. I had been accepted to UC Berkeley through a program where I could defer for two years while getting my California residency and attending community college, which was significant since I was paying for college on my own. I began working for Randall Aiman-Smith and Reed Marcy in 1996 as an office manager while taking night classes. My first foray into the legal world was soon after starting at the firm when I was ready to transfer to UC Berkeley. Rather than accepting my resident status, the Board of Regents took the position that California residency required a student to be in California “two calendar years.” Randall and Reed took up my case with the same verve as they helped their actual clients and I got the chance to comb through the UC Berkeley library to read their codes and regulations to support my position. In that experience, I learned what is was like to feel helpless against a big organization and then to have dedicated attorneys in my corner to take up my cause.

After a break to pursue my major in art history, I went to UC Hastings College of Law and continued working with Randall and Reed. Having worked together now for over 25 years, we have a unique ability to work collaboratively and finish each other’s sentences. I have strived throughout my career to make a difference in the lives of our clients. At the end of the day, if I am helping someone to get compensation for losses they suffered, then I know that all the work put into a case has been worth it.

Legal Experience

I have extensive experience in civil litigation and class action cases, including conducting discovery and depositions, calculating damages analysis, preparing motions for certification, writing appellate documents, and overseeing claims administration. We have handled several class actions against retailers where plaintiffs claimed they were forced to purchase clothing to wear to work and were not compensated for these purchases, including against Abercrombie & Fitch, Hugo Boss, Armani Exchange, Uniqlo, Dollar Tree, and Ross. Recently, I was trial counsel in a defamation claim against Bank of America on behalf of a former employee who claimed the Bank blacklisted her with future employers. The jury found Bank of America liable, including for punitive damages.

Personal Interests

Aiman-Smith & Marcy has sponsored me in the Boston Marathon and New York Marathon. When I race, I often wear a “Rockstar Ronan” shirt to support research for childhood cancer through The Ronan Thompson Foundation.

Education

University of California, Berkeley, B.A., 1999

Hastings College of the Law, University of California, J.D., 2004

Randall Aiman-Smith

Abogado (SBN 124599)

Aiman-Smith & Marcy. Oakland consumer fraud attorneys.

Educación y antecedentes

Fui afortunado. A pesar de no haber terminado la escuela secundaria o la universidad, pude -aunque con mucho trabajo- ser admitido y sobresalir en una de las mejores escuelas de derecho del país: La Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Berkeley. Mientras estuve allí, tuve el privilegio de ser editor de la California Law Review y miembro del Moot Court Board, asesorando en la redacción de escritos y en la defensa de apelaciones a otros estudiantes. Después de salir de la escuela de derecho, en mis primeros años de práctica, enseñé la escritura legal y la defensa de apelación en la Universidad de California, Hastings College of the Law. También, a lo largo de los años, he sido presentador en eventos de educación legal continua.

Experiencia legal

He sido abogado durante 35 años. He dedicado mi práctica exclusivamente a representar a empleados, consumidores e inversores en los tribunales estatales y federales de primera instancia y en los tribunales de apelación. Me gusta ir a los tribunales por mis clientes y he llevado muchos casos con jurado en los tribunales estatales y federales.

¿Ejemplos? En 2010, fui la abogada principal, junto con los otros abogados del bufete, en el caso Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad donde, después de cuatro años de preparación, el bufete obtuvo un veredicto del jurado de 1.670.000 dólares para una empleada afroamericana. En Rivero v. Surdyka, fui el abogado principal en el juicio y la apelación de un caso de derechos civiles que duró 15 años, incluyendo un juicio completo y tres apelaciones al Noveno Circuito, concluyendo finalmente con una sentencia para los demandantes de más de 2.300.000 dólares. Estos casos ilustran el lema del bufete: compromiso – resultados. Hay que comprometerse con un caso, a veces durante mucho tiempo, para obtener el resultado que el cliente merece.

No siempre ganamos en el juicio. Cuando eso ocurre, el compromiso significa llevar el caso al siguiente nivel y recurrirlo. En el caso Rivero, antes mencionado, eso fue lo que ocurrió: el tribunal desestimó el caso -habíamos perdido- pero apelamos y conseguimos una victoria para nuestros clientes que mantuvimos a través de dos apelaciones más. Desde entonces, el bufete ha conseguido muchas victorias en apelación que reivindican los derechos de los empleados y los consumidores.

A lo largo de los años he sido abogado de los demandantes en numerosos casos individuales y acciones colectivas. Puede sonar cursi, o difícil de creer, pero después de todo este tiempo, y después de todas las grandes experiencias que he tenido, mi parte favorita de ser abogado es cuando consigo dar un cheque a mi cliente.

 

Educación

Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de California, Berkeley, J.D., 1986